Search Results

Jump to Video May 18 – July 24, 2026 | Full-Time | Based at the PLCDC/KLCB Office If you’re looking for a summer opportunity that builds real skills, real experience, and real impact — this is it. PLCDC (Proof of Life Community Development Corporation) and Keep Lake Como Beautiful (KLCB) are recruiting for a 10-week, full-time, stipend-supported service position  based right here in Lake Como (Fort Worth) . This opportunity is powered by AmeriCorps VISTA Summer Associates  and is designed for people who want more than “something to do” this summer — people who want measurable outcomes, strong references, and a portfolio of work they can actually show. The basics Service Dates:  May 18 – July 24, 2026 (10 weeks) Eligibility:  Must be 18+ by May 18, 2026  and available full-time for the full 10-week term Stipend:   $957.46 paid biweekly  (Total $4,787.30  over 10 weeks) End-of-service benefit:  Choose either  an Education Award ( $1,565.08 ) or  a cash option ( $345.80 ) * Location:  PLCDC/KLCB office in Lake Como, Fort Worth *Education Award is applied to qualified school costs/loan holders (not paid as cash). What you’ll be doing (two service tracks) We place participants based on your skills, strengths, and interests . Track A — Community Capacity + Engagement You’ll help strengthen the systems that keep a neighborhood organized and connected: Support outreach, sign-ins, and follow-ups Build volunteer onboarding + tracking tools (rosters, weekly outputs) Create simple community guides and outreach materials (nonpartisan civic process education) Track B — Porch2Curb Operations + Communications You’ll help run a real-world neighborhood workflow — and document it professionally: Run issue intake + follow-through workflow (documentation, tracking, weekly summaries) Support content production (photos/video, captions, scheduling, performance notes) Coordinate neighborhood documentation + street cart support (routes, materials, counts) What you’ll gain (the real value) This isn’t busy work. You’ll leave with: Resume-ready work samples  (trackers, guides, campaign outputs, documentation) Project systems + operations experience  (real accountability, real deliverables) Stronger communication skills  (writing, consistency, reporting) Professional references  based on your outputs and reliability Requirements you should know upfront Because this opportunity is powered by AmeriCorps VISTA Summer Associates, there are standard requirements: Two qualified, non-family references  (must have email) A motivational statement  of at least 4 sentences Required background checks (criminal history + sex offender registry) Oath of Service is mandatory on May 18 Digital tools (how we work) PLCDC/KLCB operates Google Workspace only  (Drive/Docs/Sheets/Slides/Forms). You’ll receive links rather than attachments, and work is completed inside Google tools. How to express interest Start with our short interest form: bit.ly/ServeLakeComo26 After review, strong matches will be invited to a quick interview. Final selection requires completion of the official AmeriCorps application steps. Questions? Email: info@proofoflifecdc.org Phone: 682.382.1224 PLCDC / Keep Lake Como Beautiful (KLCB) Lake Como, Fort Worth Powered by AmeriCorps VISTA Summer Associates

(Quietly, Clearly, On Record) (Jump to Video) There are moments when a neighborhood doesn’t need a loud argument—just a clean record. Right now, Lake Como residents are in a season of quiet information gathering . We’re collecting names, contacts, and documentation because too often the neighborhood gets treated like it has one “official” voice—and everyone else is expected to accept decisions they weren’t notified about. Why KLCB is Doing This (And Why It’s On-Mission) Keep Lake Como Beautiful (KLCB) is a program of Proof of Life Community Development Corporation (PLCDC), a nonprofit community development corporation. PLCDC’s work includes dismantling barriers that obstruct progress in historically under-resourced communities. One significant barrier is when neighborhoods are treated like they have only one “official” voice. This leads to a lack of localized and citizen political power. In practice, this barrier appears when residents and stakeholders lack clear access to information, participation lanes, and documentation. Decision-makers often rely on a narrow channel that does not consistently reach the people most impacted. That’s why this Seat at the Table effort is intentionally quiet, clear, and on record . It’s a practical, governance-focused request that strengthens resident representation. We want to ensure that City-financed neighborhood work leaves an accessible documentation trail. Our Tone and Our Goal Because KLCB is governed by PLCDC, we’re approaching this the way our mission requires: calm, documented, and focused on barriers and solutions—not personalities. This is not anti-anyone . It’s pro-resident representation focused on process integrity , records access , and making sure Lake Como isn’t misrepresented by default. This is especially important when decisions affect residents who never received notice, updates, or a clear way to participate. What’s the Issue? When City departments treat a single organization as the primary point of contact, it creates predictable problems: Information funnels through one channel (or doesn’t reach residents at all). Notices don’t reach everyone impacted. Residents find out late. “We coordinated with the neighborhood” becomes a shortcut phrase—even when many residents never knew anything was happening. Lake Como is bigger than any one table. What We’re Asking For (Simple. Practical. Defensible.) 1) Multi-Organization Engagement City departments can work with long-standing community groups—and still practice something fair: When an issue affects Lake Como, share notices and updates with all City-registered community organizations operating within the neighborhood boundary . This includes churches, apartments, nonprofits, and neighborhood groups. That’s how you prevent gatekeeping without picking a fight. 2) Public Records and “Receipts” for City-Staff–Supported Work When City staff time , City-coordinated committees , or City-administered processes are involved, residents should be able to locate a clear documentation trail: Meeting notices or agendas (when applicable). Summaries/minutes (or documented outcomes). Decks and handouts. Deliverables (drafts + final). The custodian pathway (who holds it and where it lives). Close-out/acceptance documentation (or the City’s close-out process). This protects residents, partners, and the City. Working definition: “City-resourced” means neighborhood efforts that are supported, facilitated, convened, or administered by City staff—regardless of which community entity requested the work. (Jump to Video) Why This Matters Right Now Lake Como is facing real pressure—development activity, land-use decisions, infrastructure needs, public safety coordination, and quality-of-life issues that don’t pause just because communication systems are outdated. When notice and representation are narrow, residents are forced into reaction mode. When engagement is broad and documented, residents can participate early—and solutions move faster. What We Are NOT Doing Because this matters, we’re staying disciplined: We are not targeting individuals . We are not spreading rumors . We are not asking the City to dissolve any group . We are not encouraging harassment or disrespect . We are building a clean record—so Lake Como residents can be heard clearly and fairly. 3 Ways to Support Right Now (From the Deck) 1) Sign the Stakeholder Sign-On Form This documents resident consent around representation and records access. Your name matters. Your block matters. 2) Register Your Organization with the City If your organization serves Lake Como—especially churches, multifamily communities, and nonprofits—City registration helps ensure you receive outreach and can show up as a recognized stakeholder. City of Fort Worth Community Engagement Department Tracy L. Edwards, Community Engagement Liaison (City Council, District 6) tracy.edwards@fortworthtexas.gov | 817-392-7503 3) Share This Video with One Neighbor Not ten. Not a debate thread. Just one neighbor who cares about process, transparency, and Lake Como having more than one civic lane. Want Help or Want to Stay in the Loop? If you’re a building manager, pastor, nonprofit leader, tenant leader, community organization, or resident who wants to be included as this develops: Contact: Shavina “Miss Peacock” Taylor Program Director, Keep Lake Como Beautiful (KLCB) 💜🦁💛 info@KeepLakeComoBeautiful.org | 682.382.1224 Closing This is what community power looks like when it’s serious: Organized contacts → clean requests → receipts → and a calm insistence that Lake Como is not a one-voice neighborhood. Seat at the table—on record. 🪑

Lake Como—good news:  Lake Como Park is getting upgrades, and the work has already started. This week, City staff confirmed the scope, timeline, budget, and funding source for improvements now underway at the park. The improvements include: A Multi- gym (knee lift station, sit-up station, balance board, cardio walker) Two park benches A 6-foot-wide trail extension  connecting to the southeast parking lot A solar light Work is anticipated to wrap in 5–6 weeks , with most work completed by the Park & Recreation Department Trades team, and Transportation & Public Works assisting with installation of the solar light. And here’s the part residents deserve to know every time: ✅ Total Budget:   $125,076.20 ✅ Funding Source:   2021 Neighborhood Improvement Program (NIP) – Como neighborhood allocation The “Follow the Money” part Since February 2025 , I’ve been asking questions about the remaining NIP funds —because public dollars should never be mysterious, and Lake Como residents shouldn’t have to guess what we’re “supposed” to be grateful for. In 2021, the City’s Neighborhood Improvement Program allocated $3.19 million  to Lake Como. But even with that investment, there was still a big gap: no clear, resident-facing sustainability plan for how the investments would be maintained—or how remaining funds would be prioritized in a way residents could see and verify. That’s exactly why KLCB pushed for transparency and strategy. KLCB met with the Neighborhood Improvement Program coordinator (at the time), brought forward community priorities, and—hopeful—submitted a ready-to-execute proposal  grounded in public safety, quality of life, and resident support. That proposal emphasized what residents already knew: If you invest in visible, practical, community-used assets , you reduce blight, discourage dumping, and increase pride. And if you want a project to last, you need a community engine behind it—activation, stewardship, and consistent engagement. 【 KLCB even built a community mobilization plan  designed to drive participation and ongoing stewardship—because “build it and leave” isn’t revitalization. Why this update matters (and what it proves) Let’s be clear: this Lake Como Park project predates me . That’s not the point. The point is this: When residents don’t receive clear updates about public investments, it creates a vacuum—confusion, rumors, low trust, and missed opportunities for community ownership. KLCB’s role is to close that gap . This is what it looks like to be Lake Como’s redevelopment organization: We ask the questions  that protect community interests. We follow the funding  so residents aren’t left in the dark. We translate the bureaucracy  into plain language. We report back , consistently—so progress is visible and civic power grows. What’s coming to the park (a few details) The construction plans provided by Parks show a clear site layout and details for the new additions—including the fitness station and its components. The equipment schedule lists an Ultra Play fitness station model UP315S  with multiple elements (MultiGym, Cardio Walker, Balance Board, Sit-Up Station, and Knee Lift Station). So yes—this isn’t vague “improvements someday.” This is a defined scope you can point to and measure. The real win: residents get the benefit—and we build capacity This post is not about credit. It’s about capacity . Lake Como deserves civic systems that: communicate clearly, nurture new resident leaders, and treat community engagement as a core deliverable—not an inconvenience. That’s the work KLCB is building toward as we prepare for Season 2 : programs, people power, and neighborhood progress you can actually see. If you want to be part of that—join us. 📢 Stay connected with Keep Lake Como Beautiful (KLCB)! 💜 🦁 💛 Follow us on Facebook to stay updated on community projects, events, and ways to get involved! Let’s work together to make Lake Como cleaner, safer, and stronger. 🔗Follow us here: facebook.com/KeepLakeComoBeautiful   Call to Action 📩 Email: info@KeepLakeComoBeautiful.org 🤝 Volunteer / Partner: (insert your signup link) Lake Como—this is how we move. Together.

From “It’s in the Plan” to “It’s on the Calendar” Jump to video Goodman Park didn’t “suddenly” become a priority—this moment is the result of consistent community work, steady follow‑up, and neighbors refusing to let the City’s own plans collect dust. Keep Lake Como Beautiful (KLCB) has been in the mix doing the unglamorous work: outreach, organizing, documenting, and keeping the process moving forward. The City already had a roadmap The Como Sunset Heights NEZ Strategic Plan form 2017 included Goodman Park action steps Key message: Accountability isn’t conflict—it’s follow‑through. The plan was written. The community is just asking for the plan to be honored. What KLCB did (the heavy lifting people don’t see) Outreach (online + paper + English + Spanish) Community input (survey + conversations) Park Adoption + Stewardship (keeping the space cared for) Follow‑ups (email trails, meeting requests, documentation) Why this matters Pocket parks aren’t “extra”—they’re safety, belonging, walkability, youth activity, and neighborhood pride. Key Message... When spaces are activated and maintained, the whole neighborhood benefits. Public meeting: show up, speak up If you’ve ever said “they don’t listen,” this is your moment to put your voice on record. Show up. Bring a neighbor. Speak clearly. Then stay connected—because accountability is a process, not a one‑night event. Goodman Park Public Meeting Tues, Feb 4 2026 • 6:30 PM Como Community Center, 4660 Horne Street What residents should bring: 1–2 priorities Safety concerns + solutions Amenity ideas that fit a pocket Park footprint A willingness to stay engaged after the meeting 🌱 Save the date The Annual Spring Planting Event @ Goodman Park (3rd Saturday in March). KLCB volunteers will refresh The Roots of Resilience Flower Bed  at Goodman Park as part of our ongoing stewardship. 📢 Stay connected with Keep Lake Como Beautiful (KLCB)! 💜 🦁 💛 Follow us on Facebook to stay updated on community projects, events, and ways to get involved! Let’s work together to make Lake Como cleaner, safer, and stronger. 🔗Follow us here: facebook.com/KeepLakeComoBeautiful

Jump to Video Summary Over the past year, many Lake Como residents have asked a simple, reasonable question: “Who is responsible for what — and where can we see the record?” That question matters because Lake Como is in a once-in-a-generation moment. Decisions about land use, design standards, and public investments made now  will shape our neighborhood for decades. When public dollars are involved, residents deserve clarity — not confusion, rumor, or gatekeeping. This post explains how public records work, what has changed recently, and what happens next. What changed A City-funded support agreement connected to Lake Como neighborhood work has ended December 31, 2025. . When contracts end, active work stops — but the public record does not disappear . That distinction is important. Public funds were authorized and spent to support neighborhood deliverables. Whether a partner is still engaged or not, the documentation tied to those funds remains part of the public record . That’s not about blame. That’s about stewardship. What “the public record” means (plain language) When public money is used, residents have a right to see: The funding or grant agreement The scope of work and deliverables Materials produced under the agreement (drafts and finals) Invoices and proof of payment Records showing whether deliverables were completed and accepted Public engagement documentation tied to the work (when applicable) These records don’t belong to any one organization or individual. They belong to the public. Even after a contract ends, these documents are retained through official City channels and can be requested through the Texas Public Information Act (TPIA). What Keep Lake Como Beautiful is doing Keep Lake Como Beautiful (KLCB) , a program of Proof of Life Community Development Corporation , is doing what credible resident-led redevelopment work requires: Requesting documentation through proper City channels Organizing records into resident-readable summaries Publishing what is available — and clearly noting what is missing or pending Avoiding speculation, personal attacks, or rumor cycles Our role is not to assign motive or intent. Our role is to build the record so residents can see the facts in one place. What we are not  doing To be clear, KLCB is not : Accusing any individual or organization of wrongdoing Litigating through social media Asking former partners to continue working after contracts end We are simply saying: Public investments deserve public documentation . That standard protects everyone — residents, partners, and the City alike. Why this matters for Lake Como’s future For decades, Lake Como residents have been told to “trust the process” — often without being shown the process. Transparency changes that. When records are organized and accessible: Residents can participate with confidence New leaders can step forward informed Future partnerships start on firmer ground The neighborhood controls its own narrative Sunlight doesn’t slow progress.  It strengthens it. What happens next KLCB will continue to: Obtain records through official City public-information channels Publish neutral, factual summaries Clearly distinguish between what is documented and what is still pending Invite residents to review the materials and draw their own conclusions As always, this work is facts-first, standards-based, and resident-centered . Lake Como deserves nothing less. Stay connected If you have questions about how public records work — or want to review materials as they’re published — follow @KeepLakeComoBeautiful  and join the conversation via our weekly Office Hours: LIVE Vlogcast . Sunlight belongs to everyone.

Jump to the Video Summary Lake Como deserves tools that protect our neighborhood character and  protect the people who built this community. The City’s draft “Como Neighborhood Conservation District” is being presented as the next step in preserving neighborhood identity and guiding development. On paper, that sounds right. In practice, whether this overlay truly protects Como depends on three things most residents never get clearly explained: When the rules apply Who makes decisions and how Whether residents are protected from displacement pressures This isn’t a debate about architectural taste. This is about whether the system is built to produce consistent, fair outcomes—or whether the outcome depends on discretion, interpretation, and uneven enforcement. Early drafts shape outcomes, so we’re publishing a plain-English explainer before this moves forward. What a Conservation District really is A conservation district is a zoning overlay . That matters because overlays affect real projects: additions, demolitions, and new construction. If you are inside the boundary, certain exterior changes will be reviewed against district standards—before permits are approved. That’s why community review must be grounded in a clear, measurable question:  Will these standards be enforced consistently, with transparency and guardrails? Where the draft is strongest The draft attempts to define neighborhood patterns and includes a regulation section that speaks to lot patterns, additions, and site standards. Residents deserve predictability, and clear standards can help reduce “anything goes” development. Where the draft needs serious upgrades before legislation 1) The missing checklist problem The draft indicates that a checklist still needs to be created . That’s not a minor detail. In real life, checklists are what make review consistent. Without a checklist, outcomes can turn into “it depends who you get” at the counter. If the City wants broad feedback and fast legislation, the checklist must be published now. 2) Discretion without guardrails creates loopholes The draft includes administrative discretion in ways that can weaken the overlay’s purpose. Discretion isn’t automatically bad—but it must be controlled. That means: objective criteria, written findings, public posting of approvals, and clear appeal instructions residents can actually use. If the overlay is meant to reduce conflict and protect neighborhood patterns, discretionary adjustments can’t become the path of least resistance. 3) “Compatibility” must be evidence-based, not a taste filter Material and design standards can quietly become an affordability barrier if they are not grounded in neighborhood baseline reality. If certain materials are discouraged and others encouraged, residents deserve to see the evidence: What is the neighborhood’s existing pattern? What eras and building types define Como? How are affordability and existing housing condition being considered? Otherwise, “compatibility” can become a proxy for “make it look expensive,” which is not preservation—it’s displacement pressure. 4) You cannot promise “stability” without resident protections City planning documents acknowledge that in many low-income areas, assessed values have risen rapidly, creating tax pressure— especially for aging homeowners and families on fixed incomes. Overlay policies that increase friction and cost for repairs or improvements can unintentionally punish the very residents we claim to protect. If Como is going to carry new regulatory burdens, the draft should include: a homeowner support/resource appendix tax relief education repair assistance pathways contractor guidance and clear grandfathering rules What we’re asking for (before the City moves forward) KLCB supports neighborhood protection tools when they are enforceable, transparent, and paired with resident safeguards . Before this moves into legislation, KLCB is asking for five practical improvements: Publish the permit-review checklist now Add guardrails for administrative discretion Add a 1-page “what changes/what doesn’t” explainer + process flow Add a resident protections/support section Publish engagement counts and a Phase 2 outreach plan that reaches the whole neighborhood—not just whoever shows up at one meeting How to share feedback: If you received the City email, reply directly with your comments (bullets are fine), or attach a marked-up copy / the comment matrix. Or email your comments to DesignReview@FortWorthTexas.gov   Need an email template? The goal Como doesn’t need more documents that “sound good.” We need tools that work—tools that residents can understand, use, and trust. If the Conservation District is going to be part of Como’s future, it must be built with receipts, with clarity, and with protections —so preservation doesn’t become another word for pressure. Resources referenced in the post: Como / Sunset Heights Design Guidelines (PDF, 16MB) Como / Sunset Heights Neighborhood Empowerment Zone Plan (PDF, 20MB) Fort Worth Conservation Districts – Como (Draft Guidelines PDF) Fort Worth Zoning Ordinance: § 4.400 Conservation (“CD”) Overlay District (PDF) Neighborhood Conservation Plan (Como) (PDF)

KLCB Development Controls | Case Library Entry Why this post exists This page is a case library entry  for UDC-2025-248 (3800 Horne Street). It is designed to help Lake Como residents understand development review processes and the standards being applied. KLCB posture:  facts-first, standards-based, conditions-not-character, and measurable topics only  (walkability, lighting, landscaping/tree canopy, frontage, compatibility, construction impacts). If a case returns for action, KLCB will provide clear, standards-based participation tools. Until then, we document and educate. Video Summary: If you share only one thing, share the video — it gives neighbors the basics without noise. 1) How KLCB operates (standard first) Development Controls Civic Protocol (our SOP): This protocol explains how KLCB handles land use and design cases end-to-end: What we verify before sharing anything publicly How we build case files (“Project Receipt Packets”) When (and if) we host a community briefing/Q&A When (and only when) we recommend action 2) UDC-2025-248 Case Packet (education-first) Case Packet (working summary + receipts): This packet is the “single source of truth” summary for the case: what was requested, what documents exist, what’s known/unknown, and what questions matter. Links to all Official Source Documents can be accessed via the Case Packet. Official Source Documents (inside the Case Packet): • Urban Design Commission (UDC) Staff Report (Dec 18, 2025) (PDF) Posted Meeting Agenda (PDF) Docket / Case Listing (PDF or screenshot) 3) KLCB Public Fact Sheet— UDC-2025-248 (3800 Horne Street) : Plain-English summary of what’s proposed + what’s requested What standards apply + likely impacts/tradeoffs What’s missing/unknown Resident action options (if any) 4) Applicant Q&A (structured, measurable topics only) KLCB has invited the applicant (and/or architect) to a structured Q&A using measurable topics. If they choose to participate, we will publish short answers here for resident education. Applicant Q&A clips (if provided): Pending Important:  Any applicant-provided content is shared for education and transparency and does not represent an endorsement by Proof of Life Community Development Corporation (PLCDC) or Keep Lake Como Beautiful (KLCB) . 5) Help professionalize this lane (Volunteer Interest) We seeking calm, consistent people to help keep this lane organized: building case receipts and summaries tracking meetings and deadlines helping convert technical standards into resident-readable language Join the KLCB Development Controls Advisory Committee: Updates This post will be updated as the case changes and/or returns to an official hearing agenda. Last updated:  January 7, 2026 at 10:59 AM

Jump to Video Summary Lake Como is changing — fast. And because Lake Como is only one square mile, Horne Street is literally the center of attention . It runs through the middle of the neighborhood and functions as a corridor where investment, streetscape improvements, and redevelopment decisions concentrate. That means the conversation can’t stay stuck in group-text rumors or “who yelled loudest.” We need standards-based clarity : what the adopted rules require, what they recommend, and what the public process actually allows residents to influence. This post is an education-first guide to: what the Transition Zone  is and what it’s trying to do, how to talk about projects using adopted standards (not preferences) , and a practical example: how to handle materials debates like “brick vs siding”  without losing credibility. KLCB posture: Facts-first. Standards-based. Measurable topics only. Receipts over rumors. Video Summary If you share only one thing, share the video — it gives neighbors the basics without noise. 1) What “Transition Zone” means (in plain language) In Fort Worth’s Camp Bowie Revitalization Code  environment, the Transition Zone exists to manage the edge between higher-intensity corridor activity and nearby residential scale. In plain language, Transition Zone standards are intended to: blend new construction with existing buildings outside corridor character zones provide a reasonable buffer between existing buildings and higher density new construction support low-rise commercial and urban residential forms discourage paving side/back yards for parking and encourage neighborhood-scale development patterns This is not about “stopping development.” It’s about making sure development follows the adopted form and design rules that protect neighborhood livability and long-term corridor quality. Want the complete plain-language walkthrough with the “what’s required vs what’s recommended” framework, plus the compliance questions and submittal checklist? ➡️ Download/Read :   KLCB Transition Zone Explainer Northbound view of Horne Street in Fort Worth's Lake Como Neighborhood 2) The method: How to talk about development using standards-based review Most debates get stuck because people argue outcomes they want without confirming what the adopted standards actually say. Two questions settle most disputes: Compliance Question #1: Which standards are triggered for this site (zone + street type + adjacency), and what is required vs recommended ? Compliance Question #2: Does the proposal meet the Transition Zone’s form requirements (height, placement, frontage, screening, and edge protections)? If not, what is the documented justification or modification request? A key rule in Fort Worth’s form-based code world: Shall = required Should = recommended May = optional If a point in dispute is based on a “should,”  it’s not enforceable unless another section makes it a “shall.”  KLCB starts with shall  standards first — then discusses should  improvements. 3) What residents can insist on (without financing the project) Residents don’t get to “pick materials” like the owner — but residents absolutely can insist that a project: complies with adopted standards , and doesn’t get waivers without clear, documented reasons and mitigations . That’s the difference between preference politics  and credible advocacy . KLCB’s stance stays simple: We don’t argue preferences. We check compliance, document what’s requested, and push conditions tied to adopted standards. 4) Materials module example: “Brick vs siding” (how to end the argument) Materials debates are common — and they often become emotional fast. Here’s how KLCB teaches it: A) Preference vs Standard Preference:  “We like brick.” Standard-based:  “Show us your façade material schedule with percentages and confirm you meet the adopted façade/material standards that apply to this frontage.” B) If the code doesn’t mandate brick, you still have leverage via conditions + commitments Even when the code does not require a specific material, residents can make defensible asks  that improve durability and long-term outcomes: Provide a material schedule : what material, where it appears, and % breakdown  of each street-facing elevation Commit to durability where it matters most: the ground-floor/base (“touch zone”) , corners, and pedestrian-facing frontage Confirm product + detailing: fiber cement thickness, trim, moisture detailing, impact resistance in high-contact areas Provide a warranties/maintenance plan so “it’ll look good” becomes a documented commitment C) What to say when someone claims “we can’t do anything unless we finance the build” Two things are true — at different phases: During entitlement (UDC/COA/waiver/rezoning/overlay): You can influence outcomes by tying requests to adopted standards, compatibility, and documented impacts — or negotiating voluntary commitments. After construction: If materials fail, peel, warp, rot, or create hazards, that becomes a reporting and enforcement issue (311/MyFWApp), plus KLCB documentation and pattern tracking via the KLCB Resolve Project . 5) What KLCB produces (so the work stays calm and consistent) KLCB’s Development Controls Advisory Committee produces standardized, reusable tools so everyone has the same baseline: KLCB’s Development Controls Civic Protocol (how we operate) Project Receipt Packet  (verified case file + required attachments checklist) Public Fact Sheet (one page)  (resident-readable summary) Written Q&A (measurable topics only)  (builder answers in writing; optional <60-second clips) Position Note + Comment Support  (only if action is needed) Decision Receipt  (what happened, what’s next, how to stay informed) Lake Como builds credibility and long-term leverage via documentation and standards-based clarity. Call to Action (clean + non-drama) If you care about how Horne Street development affects walkability, lighting, landscaping/tree canopy, building placement, screening, and neighborhood compatibility — we need calm, consistent people in this lane. Join the KLCB Development Controls Advisory Committee

If you’ve ever reported a problem in Lake Como—called 911, filed a MyFW request, talked to Code or trash services—and then wondered what happened next? You’re not alone. Too often, residents are left guessing: Did anyone see this? Is someone working on it? Why does this problem keep coming back? The KLCB Sunlight Campaign  was built to change that. Download the Sunlight Tools for Lake Como Sunlight Campaign Flyer (PDF)  Quick overview + QR code to submit a report.  Sunlight Campaign Image For posting on social media, group chats, and text threads.   Resident Explainer (PDF)  Plain-language explainer for porch conversations and meetings.  What is the KLCB Sunlight Campaign? Lake Como residents deserve consistent, respectful service from the City of Fort Worth teams assigned to our neighborhood. The KLCB Sunlight Campaign helps us document what’s happening on our blocks, track follow-through, and make clear patterns visible—so we can improve safety and neighborhood conditions together. Sunlight turns individual stories into receipts, not rumors : How did the system show up for you? Did anything actually change on the ground ? Add your voice. Share your receipts. Help us track what’s working—and what needs follow-through. Submit your Sunlight check-in at bit.ly/KLCBSunlight  after you interact with FWPD, Code, Environmental Services, Solid Waste, or KFWB. What Sunlight Measures Sunlight tracks City follow-through on resident-reported quality-of-life issues on two rails : Service Experience – how the system shows up  Access, respect, clarity, timeliness, communication, consistency, and coordination between departments. Outcomes – what actually changes  Actions taken, time-to-result, resolution status, durability of fixes, and whether problems repeat or come right back. In plain language:  We measure how you were treated  and what got fixed (or didn’t) —block by block. Who’s Involved Sunlight may involve interactions with multiple City teams, including: Fort Worth Police Department (FWPD)  – criminal activity, enforcement, public safety response. Code Compliance / Neighborhood Investigations  – property maintenance, nuisance conditions, dumping on private property, blight-related code violations. Environmental Services / Solid Waste Services  – bulk pickup, garbage/recycling service, litter/waste reduction support, and coordination on dumping-related issues. Keep Fort Worth Beautiful (KFWB)  – cleanup and litter-prevention programming, event-based community support. Behind the scenes, Sunlight also connects to Fort Worth’s oversight systems: CPU (inside oversight):  structured reviews, data, corrective action planning. OPOM (outside oversight):  transparency, accountability, complaints, data, community engagement. KLCB (neighborhood ground truth):  resident-facing Sunlight Reports, Resolve Project case packets, MyFW escalation tracking, and WHUB storytelling. How Sunlight Works (Residents) You interact with a City service  FWPD, Code, Environmental/Solid Waste, KFWB, or another service that affects safety or conditions on your block. You submit a quick Sunlight check-in  Go to bit.ly/KLCBSunlight  and answer short questions about: How you were treated (service experience), and Whether anything changed (outcome). Your feedback joins the Sunlight dataset  KLCB groups responses by patterns—not by individual names—to create: Resident Safety Feedback Reports, Block-level case stories through The Resolve Project , and Evidence for conversations with City leadership, CPU, and OPOM. Privacy & Trust You can stay anonymous , or You can share your name/contact if you want follow-up on your specific issue. Either way, your feedback is counted in grouped data and pattern reports. We focus on conditions and systems , not blaming individual residents. Who Runs Sunlight? The KLCB Sunlight Campaign is managed by Keep Lake Como Beautiful (KLCB) , a program of Proof of Life Community Development Corporation (PLCDC) . We do not  replace 911, Code, or any City department. Our role is to: Help residents document real experiences, Track follow-through over time, and Advocate for better standards and better outcomes in partnership with City teams. Questions:  682.382.1224 | info@keeplakecomobeautiful.org What Lake Como Should Be Able to Expect The KLCB Sunlight Campaign doesn’t just collect stories—it points to a basic “floor” for how public safety and City service partners should work with Lake Como. Here’s a quick snapshot of those expectations. For resident leaders and partners: KLCB has developed full Public Safety Partnership Standards for Lake Como. Email info@keeplakecomobeautiful.org  with “Sunlight Standards” in the subject line to learn more.

Who decides. How decisions move. When residents can comment. Educational use only : nonpartisan, public-process training—no legal advice. What is the Como EDDRC The Como EDDRC  reviews development/design for the Horne Street corridor (Lovell → Victory)  under form-based code  and related guidelines. Charter effective Feb 3, 2025.   The committee votes and issues opinion letters  and, when needed, is represented at UDC, BOA, Zoning Commission, and City Council . The transparency we’ve requested Publish within 10 business days : EDDRC roster & roles Charter/bylaw status  (adoption date; where it sits in NAC rules) A plain-language Decision Map  (how items move to a vote/Council) Meeting calendar  + public comment windows A status snapshot  (items in flight; upcoming milestones; official POC) KLCB requested a simple transition note as the current support contract winds down (deliverables to date; point of contact as of Jan 1, 2026). Why this matters? Design & code decisions set the Horne Street  trajectory for years. Residents deserve posted facts— who , how , when —before anything advances to City boards or Council. What we know vs. what’s missing We know (from the Charter):  corridor scope, responsibilities, meeting rhythm, and where opinions go. Missing (as of today):   Publish: Roster & roles Publish: Charter/bylaw status  (with adoption date) Publish: Decision map  (how items move to a vote/Council) Public briefing  with timeline & comment windows Transition snapshot  as the support contract ends (deliverables to date, items in flight, Point of Contact on Jan 1, 2026 ) Dates to use your voice Thursday, Oct 2, 2025 — District 6 Town Hall (Lake Como):  Request an EDDRC transparency update  and links to posted materials. How to plug in (fast) Bring these two asks to every meeting: “Please publish the EDDRC roster, charter status, and decision map—and schedule a public briefing before any Council action.” Add your question  for the community FAQ: [insert short link] Share documents  you receive: [insert upload/email lin k] Timeline Apr 2025:  EDDRC formed (no public roster/site). Sept 10, 2025:  District 6 transparency request sent (posted here after delivery). Sept 15, 2025:  NAC Leadership Meeting (resident questions). Oct 2, 2025:  District 6 Town Hall (request an EDDRC update). Live tracker (Documents & links updated as items arrive) Roster posted:  [link / pending] Charter/bylaw note:  [link / pending] Decision map:  [image/link / pending] Calendar & agendas:  [link / pending] Opinion letters & minutes:  [link / pending] Status log:  [link / pending] Resident question form: [link] Glossary & FAQs What is a decision map?   A simple flow showing who decides and when public comment happens. UDC = Urban Design Commission City board that reviews design issues—streetscape, building placement/form, materials, signage—often for areas with special design standards. They can approve/deny or recommend on design waivers. Public can comment. BOA = Board of Adjustment Quasi-judicial board that hears variances (requests to bend a zoning rule), special exceptions, and administrative appeals. They do not change zoning; they decide case-by-case relief from the ordinance. Public can comment. Zoning (Commission) = Zoning Commission Advisory body that holds hearings on rezonings, zoning map changes, and certain permits, then recommends action to City Council. Public hearing + comment required. (City Council is the final decision-maker on rezoning.) Plain English: Design/look → UDC . Rule-bending/variances → BOA . Changing the zoning itself → Zoning Commission (then City Council). Resources Como EDDRC Charter — scope, duties, process, and timelines. Ask Questions: JOIN Office hours: Thu @ 10am CT. bit.ly/KLCBmeetings Resident Leadership Academy (KLCB) Practice > Posture. KLCB runs a short Resident Leadership Academy  to equip neighbors and small businesses to engage in corridor decisions. In 5 sessions we cover: Form-Based Code 101 , NEZ & design guidelines , how EDDRC works , UDC/BOA/Zoning basics , and how to craft public comment . Graduates leave with simple checklists, a decision-map cheat sheet, and starter tasks tied to real projects on Horne. Want in? Last updated:  9/9/2026 About KLCB:   A resident-led program of PLCDC focused on a safer, cleaner, more prosperous Lake Como. This page is educational —to help neighbors understand how design/code decisions are made and how to participate. For official City info, contact Economic Development.

Welcome to KLCB’s Live Notices Feed . As a registered redevelopment organization, we receive and share official City Plan Commission notices that specifically affect Lake Como . We stack the newest notice on top  and add updates (agenda links, deadlines, outcomes). Bookmark this page and check back often. Este es el Boletín en Vivo de KLCB — solo Lake Como . Compartimos avisos de la Comisión de Planificación  que afectan a Lake Como . Guarde este enlace y vuelva con frecuencia —el aviso más reciente aparece arriba. *KLCB shares this as a courtesy. We are not the applicant and do not set City procedures. How to Participate (quick): Written comments:  Email platbox2@fortworthtexas.gov  by the business day before, 5:00 PM (CT) . Add your name + signature . Speak in person:  Arrive 15 minutes early . 2–3 minute remarks. State name, address, case # . Confirm details:  The agenda posts Friday  before the hearing on the City’s Platting/CPC page. Case Index Farnsworth Ave Closure (VA-25-017) 5 September 2025 The City Plan Commission will consider a physical closure of Farnsworth Ave  at Merrick St  (CD-6). If you live on/near Farnsworth or drive it to get around, this may affect access and block layout. View/Share: Youtube Vid Details When:  Wed, Sept 17, 2025  — Work Session 12:30 PM  • Public Hearing 1:30 PM Where:   New City Hall (Terrace Level — City Council Work Session Room) 100 Fort Worth Trail, Fort Worth, TX 76102 Area:  N of Helmick • S of Blackmore • W of Neville • E of Prevost Watch:  Fort Worth Television/YouTube (view-only) Speak:  In-person recommended if you want to comment How to participate Email written comments by Tue, Sept 16, 5:00 PM (CT)  → platbox2@fortworthtexas.gov . Include full name + signature  (signature can trigger a super-majority on plats with waivers). Speak in person  on Wed, Sept 17. Arrive by 1:15 PM . Plan 2–3 minutes ; state your name, address, and case # VA-25-017 . Confirm agenda/status  (posts Friday before): fortworthtexas.gov/departments/development-services/platting Contact Case Coordinator:   Alexander.Parks@fortworthtexas.gov  • (817) 392-2638 Comments inbox:   platbox2@fortworthtexas.gov FAQ items Q1. What’s being proposed? A physical closure of Farnsworth Ave  at Merrick St  (both sides). Case VA-25-017 . Q2. Where exactly is this? General area: N of Helmick • S of Blackmore • W of Neville • E of Prevost . Q3. When/where is the hearing? Wed, Sept 17, 2025  — Work Session 12:30 PM  • Public Hearing 1:30 PM , New City Hall , Terrace Level (City Council Work Session Room), 100 Fort Worth Trail . Q4. How do I send written comments? Email platbox2@fortworthtexas.gov  by Tue, Sept 16, 5:00 PM (CT) . Include your name + signature . Q5. Can I speak remotely? You can watch  online. To speak , attend in person . Q6. What “signature” is needed? Type your full name  as a signature in the email or attach a signed PDF/photo. A signature can trigger a super-majority vote  on plats with waivers. Q7. Who can I contact? Case Coordinator:   Alexander.Parks@fortworthtexas.gov , (817) 392-2638 . Q8. Where do I confirm the latest info? Check the City’s CPC/Platting page (agenda posts Friday before  the hearing): fortworthtexas.gov/departments/development-services/platting See something shaping Como? It shows up here.  This is KLCB’s Live Notices Feed —one link, always current. We post City Plan Commission notices, plain-language explainers, and how to weigh in. Newest notice on top.  Save this page and check back often. >>> Back To Top <<<

📍 Location: Fletcher Ave, Lake Como TX 📆 First reported: 2023 | 🎉 Resolved: 2025 💬 "He wanted to bully her into silence. But her voice—and her block—mattered more." In 2023, a longtime Lake Como resident made a simple, reasonable request: Please stop dumping bulk trash on our block. But instead of accountability, she got backlash. The property owner she approached didn’t just ignore her concerns—he made it personal.  He cursed her out. He put up a graffiti-style sign mocking her advocacy. In all capital letters, the plywood sign read: ❌ “NO DUMPING OL’ MESSY BROAD, INC.” There it stayed— an eyesore, an insult, and a warning to anyone else thinking about speaking up. Winter, spring, summer, fall—every single day, this neighbor had to walk past that message. And for two years, despite reporting the issue, nothing changed. But this week, something did  change. With encouragement from KLCB’s founder Peacock Taylor, she submitted a new report— this time using the MyFW App. Within 24 hours , the City’s Graffiti Abatement Team  was on-site. The offensive words were painted over. The sign still exists, but its power to humiliate has been dismantled. ✅ The lesson? Her voice mattered. The tools were there. She just needed to be heard. This isn't just one story. It’s a pattern we see across Lake Como: A resident takes initiative A neighbor clings to decay Retaliation follows, and progress stalls We call it being "Blocked from Progress." But at KLCB, we believe every block deserves better. 📲 Want to Take Action Like She Did? 🧱 KLCB Block Breakdown A tool for residents, by residents. The KLCB Block Breakdown  helps us grade blocks A–F using community-powered assessments of: 1️⃣ Cleanliness & Property Maintenance    Litter, dumping, overgrown grass, abandoned items, clean sidewalks? 2️⃣ Housing & Structural Condition    Homes in good repair? Fences, driveways maintained? Vacant structures secure? 3️⃣ Safety & Crime Prevention    Well-lit alleys? Visible pathways? Hiding spots or graffiti present? 4️⃣ Streets & Infrastructure    Are streets, sidewalks, signage, and lighting functional? 5️⃣ Community Engagement & Curb Appeal    Signs of pride? Painted address numbers, porches in use, flags, gardens? Whether you’re a homeowner, a renter, or a volunteer, you can help document conditions and drive neighborhood pride. 🗓️ Results are shared live every Thursday at 10 AM during Office Hours. 🔗 Join us: bit.ly/KLCBmeetings 📝 Already Reported It—But Nothing Happened? Introducing the KLCB Resolve Project If you've reported an issue to Code, Police, or the City—**and nothing’s changed—**this tool is for you. Submit an escalation intake form  and KLCB will follow up with the department on your behalf. Let’s get your voice out of the inbox—and into action. 🔗 Submit your case: https://bit.ly/ResolveProject Tell Your Story If you’ve faced similar backlash for speaking up, share your experience. Email: info@KeepLakeComoBeautiful.org