When Outrage Outruns Strategy
- Miss Peacock
- Jul 24
- 15 min read
Updated: 4 days ago
Video: OUTRAGE ≠ STRATEGY
COMPLETE Youtube Playlist:
16 Questions Before the Rules Change | Como Conservation District https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLOa8D3b5iQuw
The meeting was canceled. The questions were not.
An unattributed flyer circulated online about a proposed Como Conservation District gathering. The Lake Como Neighborhood Advisory Council responded by stamping the flyer “CANCELED” and telling residents to rely on official NAC communications.
Then, with very little notice, the gathering scheduled for July 23 was canceled.
The immediate temptation is to referee personalities.
Who posted what? Who meant well? Who overstepped? Who had authority?
That is not the most useful question.
The larger issue is what happens when outrage outruns strategy.
When civic action is driven by emotion instead of preparation, residents can end up with less access.
An impulsive post can create confusion. An unattributed flyer can travel beyond the neighborhood. Gatekeepers can use that confusion to reclaim control. City staff can step back. Residents are left sorting through competing claims about who speaks for the community and where accurate information lives.
Whatever ultimately caused the cancellation, the confusion did not help.
Video: The Meeting Was Canceled. The Questions Were Not.
The written record still stands
Keep Lake Como Beautiful has been participating in the discussion about the proposed Como Conservation District since August 2025.
We began publishing resident education in January 2026. We reviewed the February draft and the April 17 document later described as the “final document.” We invited residents to read the materials and submit informed comments.
On two separate occasions, KLCB raised questions about enforcement, appeals, affordability, administrative discretion, resident protections, and economic impact.
Finally, at 8:00 a.m. on July 23, KLCB submitted a 21-page written record to the City of Fort Worth.
That record identifies contradictions and asks 16 numbered questions about proposed rules that could affect what homeowners are allowed to build, repair, replace, renovate, or finance.
The document did not disappear because the gathering was canceled.
The questions remain on the record.
The contradictions still exist.
The City still owes Lake Como residents answers.
The single-voice bottleneck
The NAC may issue official communications on behalf of the NAC.
But the NAC is not the City of Fort Worth.
It is not Lake Como’s only organization.
And it should not become the single doorway through which every resident, homeowner, renter, nonprofit, business, property owner, and community stakeholder receives information affecting the neighborhood.
City information should come directly from the City.
Neighborhood information should be distributed broadly.
No single organization should control what Lake Como knows, when Lake Como knows it, or which voices are considered legitimate.
That single-voice bottleneck is one of the exact concerns KLCB placed into the City record.
Video: The NAC Is Not the City
Why KLCB is not prepared to support the current proposal
Preserving Lake Como’s history matters.
But preservation cannot become another barrier to progress in a neighborhood that has already endured redlining, disinvestment, uneven service delivery, and suppressed economic growth.
The current document contains conflicting or incomplete standards involving:
building height;
porch depth;
window requirements;
tree canopy;
architectural styles;
materials;
repairs;
additions;
garages and parking;
administrative adjustments;
notification;
enforcement;
and appeals.
Those are not cosmetic editing problems.
They can affect construction costs, property use, financing, repair decisions, development feasibility, and long-term investment.
This is my home and one of my largest investments.
Longtime homeowners sustained this community through decades when institutions did not. New homeowners believed in Lake Como enough to place their financial futures here.
Before new regulations are placed over our property, we deserve legitimate representation, complete information, clear standards, practical protections, and written answers.
Based on the document that currently exists, KLCB is not prepared to support the proposed Conservation District moving forward.
Video: This Is My Home
What happens next
A meeting was scheduled.
The meeting was canceled.
The questions were not.
And a campaign was born.
KLCB is not organizing a mob.
We are organizing the questions.
The campaign is called:
16 Questions Before the Rules Change
This is a structured public-education and written-record campaign built around the 16 numbered questions in KLCB’s official 21-page submission to the City of Fort Worth.
The Purpose Is Simple
Help residents and stakeholders understand the proposed Como Conservation District overlay, connect each of the 16 questions to their own lives, submit personalized requests for written answers, and build a public record showing what the City answers, rejects, defers, contradicts, or leaves unanswered before the rules move forward.
Watch: We Are Not Organizing a Mob
How the Campaign Works
Each question will move through the same campaign system:
1. One plain-language question card
KLCB will publish one question at a time using a consistent campaign graphic.
Each card will identify:
the question;
the source page or provision that created it;
why the issue matters;
the action residents can take;
and the current status of the City’s written response.
2. One Facebook feed post or Reel
The caption or Reel description will explain the issue in plain language and direct residents to the next step.
Every campaign post will point back to this S2E20 blog, which serves as the permanent campaign record.
3. One Lunch Live explanation
KLCB will go LIVE to break down the day’s question and provide two or three examples residents can use to complete this sentence:
“This matters to me because…”
Residents do not need to be planners, attorneys, developers, or policy experts.
They only need to explain how the issue could affect their home, family, property, business, affordability, future investment, or connection to Lake Como.
4. One personalized email template
The complete email template will be placed in the first comment beneath each campaign post.
Residents will be asked to:
READ the question.
ADD one or two personal sentences.
SEND the email to: designreview@fortworthtexas.gov
SAVE the sent email and the City’s written response.
This is not a petition.
This is not spam.
This is not an effort to overwhelm City staff with identical messages.
Each participant is being asked to personalize the template and explain why the question matters to them.
5. One public response status
As written responses are received, KLCB will update each question using one of the following categories:
AWAITING WRITTEN RESPONSE
ANSWERED
REJECTED
DEFERRED
CONTRADICTED
UNANSWERED
Copying KLCB allows us to preserve and compare written responses, identify contradictions, track unanswered questions, and update the public campaign record.
KLCB will not publish personal email addresses, home addresses, telephone numbers, signatures, or other personal information without permission.
Where to Follow the Campaign
Facebook Event
The Facebook Event is the campaign’s active gathering place.
Use it to follow the daily question drops, Lunch Live broadcasts, reminders, updates, and participation instructions:
Permanent Campaign Record https://wix.to/TfPycEJ
This S2E20 blog will remain the permanent home for:
the campaign explanation;
all 16 questions;
source references;
email templates;
City responses;
response-status updates;
contradictions or corrections;
and final campaign findings.
Campaign Email
Questions, copied correspondence, and requests for assistance should be sent to:
Subscribe to The Pride
Subscribe for campaign updates and future KLCB public-education tools:
Need Help Participating?
KLCB can help residents and stakeholders:
locate the source language;
understand the question in plain language;
identify how the issue may affect them;
personalize the email template;
submit the email through the verified City channel;
copy KLCB on the correspondence;
and save or print the written record.
KLCB will not tell residents what position to take or speak on their behalf.
The goal is to help each person place their own informed question, concern, or experience into the written public record.
Technical Assistance
Monday–Friday, 10:00 a.m.–4:00 p.m.
5112 Bonnell Avenue
Additional evening assistance times will be announced through the Facebook Event.
Five Minutes Can Strengthen the Record
You need:
Five minutes.
An email account.
One personalized sentence.
And the template provided with each question.
Every informed participant increases the pressure for the City of Fort Worth to provide complete written answers—and strengthens Lake Como’s influence over decisions that could shape this neighborhood for decades.
Video: Outrage Gets Attention. Strategy Gets Answers.
16 Questions. Written Answers. Before the Rules Change.
QUESTION 01 OF 16: WHAT DOES “FINAL” MEAN?
STATUS: 🟡 AWAITING WRITTEN RESPONSE
In Plain Language
Is the April 2026 Draft of the Como Conservation District Design Guidelines really final—or is it still open to correction?
The Actual Question Submitted to the City
Define the status of the 58-page April 2026 Draft of the Como Conservation District Design Guidelines described as the “final document.” Will the City issue a corrected, dated, version-controlled file and page-by-page change log before any hearing?
Why It Matters
Residents cannot meaningfully review a moving target. A document with TBD page numbers, an outdated timeline, and a placeholder page should not quietly become the basis for legislation.
Source
Official Record Q1 • April 2026 Draft of Como Conservation District Design Guidelines, pp. 1, 17–18, 58 • July 21–22 correspondence
Take Action
📩 Add one or two sentences explaining why this question matters to you.
SEND TO: designreview@fortworthtexas.govCC: CD@KeepLakeComoBeautiful.orgSAVE: Your sent email and the City’s written response.
Watch the Lunch Live
[EMBED QUESTION 01 VIDEO HERE]
City Response
As of August 7, 2026: KLCB has not received a substantive written response to this question.
QUESTION 02 OF 16: WHO REQUESTED THE REVIEW?
STATUS: 🟡 AWAITING WRITTEN RESPONSE
In Plain Language
Who was called “neighborhood leadership,” and who authorized them to speak for the neighborhood?
The Actual Question Submitted to the City
Identify who requested the July 23 gathering, the organization or capacity represented, whether attendance was open, and how the gathering will appear in the official project history.
Why It Matters
A private request can produce a meeting, but it cannot automatically become evidence that Lake Como’s residents, owners, businesses, or organizations requested or endorsed the proposal.
Source
Official Record Q2 • Engagement history, p. 17 • July correspondence
Take Action
📩 Add one or two sentences explaining why this question matters to you.
SEND TO: designreview@fortworthtexas.govCC: CD@KeepLakeComoBeautiful.orgSAVE: Your sent email and the City’s written response.
Watch the Lunch Live
[EMBED QUESTION 02 VIDEO HERE]
City Response
As of August 7, 2026: KLCB has not received a substantive written response to this question.
QUESTION 03 OF 16: WILL A SMALL ROOM BECOME “CONSENSUS”?
STATUS: 🟡 AWAITING WRITTEN RESPONSE
In Plain Language
Can attendance, silence, or a small invited group be treated as neighborhood support?
The Actual Question Submitted to the City
Confirm that attendance, silence, informal comments, or lack of objection at a privately requested gathering will not be characterized as community support, neighborhood consensus, resident comfort, or endorsement.
Why It Matters
People can be absent because they were not notified, did not receive the documents, or did not know the gathering was open. Silence is not consent.
Source
Official Record Q3 • July correspondence
Take Action
📩 Add one or two sentences explaining why this question matters to you.
SEND TO: designreview@fortworthtexas.govCC: CD@KeepLakeComoBeautiful.orgSAVE: Your sent email and the City’s written response.
Watch the Lunch Live
[EMBED QUESTION 03 VIDEO HERE]
City Response
As of August 7, 2026: KLCB has not received a substantive written response to this question.
QUESTION 04 OF 16: WHERE WERE THE SOURCE DOCUMENTS?
STATUS: 🟡 AWAITING WRITTEN RESPONSE
In Plain Language
Why were residents invited without the City page, current document, comment matrix, or comment instructions?
The Actual Question Submitted to the City
Explain why the July notice omitted the official landing page, April 2026 Draft of Como Conservation District Design Guidelines, comment matrix, version/status, and comment instructions. Commit to a complete source package in every future communication.
Why It Matters
A date and time are not meaningful public engagement when residents are not given the materials needed to prepare.
Source
Official Record Q4 • July 21 notice • February distribution history
Take Action
📩 Add one or two sentences explaining why this question matters to you.
SEND TO: designreview@fortworthtexas.govCC: CD@KeepLakeComoBeautiful.orgSAVE: Your sent email and the City’s written response.
Watch the Lunch Live
[EMBED QUESTION 04 VIDEO HERE]
City Response
As of August 7, 2026: KLCB has not received a substantive written response to this question.
QUESTION 05 OF 16: WERE KLCB’S COMMENTS COUNTED?
STATUS: 🟡 AWAITING WRITTEN RESPONSE
In Plain Language
How could the City say no additional comments were received when KLCB submitted written comments?
The Actual Question Submitted to the City
Confirm that KLCB’s January 16 and April 22 submissions are logged. Explain the July 22 statement and publish an updated matrix showing incorporated, partial, rejected, deferred, and unresolved items.
Why It Matters
Comments that are not logged cannot shape the document, be answered publicly, or remain visible when staff and leadership change.
Source
Official Record Q5 • January 16 and April 22 submissions • July 22 response
Take Action
📩 Add one or two sentences explaining why this question matters to you.
SEND TO: designreview@fortworthtexas.govCC: CD@KeepLakeComoBeautiful.orgSAVE: Your sent email and the City’s written response.
Watch the Lunch Live
[EMBED QUESTION 05 VIDEO HERE]
City Response
As of August 7, 2026: KLCB has not received a substantive written response to this question.
QUESTION 06 OF 16: WHO PARTICIPATED—AND WHO WAS MISSING?
STATUS: 🟡 AWAITING WRITTEN RESPONSE
In Plain Language
What evidence shows that renters, younger residents, Spanish-speaking households, new homeowners, and underrepresented blocks were reached?
The Actual Question Submitted to the City
Publish focus-group membership and selection, affiliations, blocks represented, attendance, survey/comment totals, owner/renter participation, and the Phase 2 outreach plan and timeline.
Why It Matters
A process cannot be called representative without showing who participated and which voices were absent.
Source
Official Record Q6 • April 2026 Draft of Como Conservation District Design Guidelines, pp. 5, 17 • Comment matrix
Take Action
📩 Add one or two sentences explaining why this question matters to you.
SEND TO: designreview@fortworthtexas.govCC: CD@KeepLakeComoBeautiful.orgSAVE: Your sent email and the City’s written response.
Watch the Lunch Live
[EMBED QUESTION 06 VIDEO HERE]
City Response
As of August 7, 2026: KLCB has not received a substantive written response to this question.
QUESTION 07 OF 16: WHICH REPAIRS TRIGGER REVIEW?
STATUS: 🟡 AWAITING WRITTEN RESPONSE
In Plain Language
Will ordinary repairs, in-kind replacement, and work on existing homes require Conservation District approval?
The Actual Question Submitted to the City
Publish one definitive trigger list. State whether ordinary maintenance and in-kind replacement are exempt, which elevations/site features are covered, and how grandfathering protects existing conditions.
Why It Matters
Homeowners need to know whether replacing siding, windows, roofing, fencing, paving, trees, or a porch becomes a new approval process—and what happens when the existing home does not comply.
Source
Official Record Q7 • April 2026 Draft of Como Conservation District Design Guidelines, pp. 4, 7, 10, 22, 40, 42–43, 57
Take Action
📩 Add one or two sentences explaining why this question matters to you.
SEND TO: designreview@fortworthtexas.govCC: CD@KeepLakeComoBeautiful.orgSAVE: Your sent email and the City’s written response.
Watch the Lunch Live
[EMBED QUESTION 07 VIDEO HERE]
City Response
As of August 7, 2026: KLCB has not received a substantive written response to this question.
QUESTION 08 OF 16: WHICH WORDS ARE RULES?
STATUS: 🟡 AWAITING WRITTEN RESPONSE
In Plain Language
What is enforceable—and what is only a suggestion?
The Actual Question Submitted to the City
Label every provision as an enforceable standard or nonbinding guideline. Define objective terms such as “best example,” “compatible,” “match the block,” and “neighborhood character,” and state the review timeline and findings required.
Why It Matters
A document cannot promise predictable administration while mixing must, shall, should, usually, often, typically, and preferred.
Source
Official Record Q8 • April 2026 Draft of Como Conservation District Design Guidelines, p. 8 and standards sections
Take Action
📩 Add one or two sentences explaining why this question matters to you.
SEND TO: designreview@fortworthtexas.govCC: CD@KeepLakeComoBeautiful.orgSAVE: Your sent email and the City’s written response.
Watch the Lunch Live
[EMBED QUESTION 08 VIDEO HERE]
City Response
As of August 7, 2026: KLCB has not received a substantive written response to this question.
QUESTION 09 OF 16: WHICH ARCHITECTURAL STYLES ARE ACTUALLY ALLOWED?
STATUS: 🟡 AWAITING WRITTEN RESPONSE
In Plain Language
Why do prohibited styles receive standards and roof adjustments while allowed styles are missing from the tables?
The Actual Question Submitted to the City
Publish one definitive allowed-style list and complete roof table. Explain Queen Anne, Neo-Eclectic, Folk Victorian, Contemporary, Ranch, and the six-lot pattern rule.
Why It Matters
Style rules affect design cost, marketability, floor plans, materials, and whether a builder or homeowner can use a practical modern design.
Source
Official Record Q9 • April 2026 Draft of Como Conservation District Design Guidelines, pp. 7, 15–16, 22, 35–36, 40, 45, 52, 54–56
Take Action
📩 Add one or two sentences explaining why this question matters to you.
SEND TO: designreview@fortworthtexas.govCC: CD@KeepLakeComoBeautiful.orgSAVE: Your sent email and the City’s written response.
Watch the Lunch Live
[EMBED QUESTION 09 VIDEO HERE]
City Response
As of August 7, 2026: KLCB has not received a substantive written response to this question.
QUESTION 10 OF 16: WHAT HAPPENS TO LOTS AND ADDITIONS?
STATUS: 🟡 AWAITING WRITTEN RESPONSE
In Plain Language
Are larger lots restricted, and can owners build side additions or only rear additions?
The Actual Question Submitted to the City
Correct zoning labels; state minimum/maximum lot dimensions; explain larger lots, consolidation, subdivision, replatting, irregular lots, controlling setbacks, side/rear additions, second stories, roof ridges, and step-backs.
Why It Matters
These rules affect how owners use multiple lots, expand homes, build for multigenerational living, or develop vacant property.
Source
Official Record Q10 • April 2026 Draft of Como Conservation District Design Guidelines, pp. 7, 38–39, 41–44
Take Action
📩 Add one or two sentences explaining why this question matters to you.
SEND TO: designreview@fortworthtexas.govCC: CD@KeepLakeComoBeautiful.orgSAVE: Your sent email and the City’s written response.
Watch the Lunch Live
[EMBED QUESTION 10 VIDEO HERE]
City Response
As of August 7, 2026: KLCB has not received a substantive written response to this question.
QUESTION 11 OF 16: CAN DUPLEXES, GARAGES, AND PARKING ACTUALLY FIT?
STATUS: 🟡 AWAITING WRITTEN RESPONSE
In Plain Language
Can a B-2 duplex comply on a 50-foot lot with the proposed driveway, garage, alley, parking, and paving rules?
The Actual Question Submitted to the City
Provide dimensioned compliant examples for duplex lots with and without alleys. State when each garage type is permitted, how the 10-foot driveway limit works, and what paving/hardscape is allowed.
Why It Matters
Rules that look reasonable separately may make an ordinary lot impossible or too expensive to develop when combined.
Source
Official Record Q11 • April 2026 Draft of Como Conservation District Design Guidelines, pp. 41–42, 45, 49
Take Action
📩 Add one or two sentences explaining why this question matters to you.
SEND TO: designreview@fortworthtexas.govCC: CD@KeepLakeComoBeautiful.orgSAVE: Your sent email and the City’s written response.
Watch the Lunch Live
[EMBED QUESTION 11 VIDEO HERE]
City Response
As of August 7, 2026: KLCB has not received a substantive written response to this question.
QUESTION 12 OF 16: WHAT ARE THE ACTUAL NUMBERS?
STATUS: 🟡 AWAITING WRITTEN RESPONSE
In Plain Language
Is the standard 28 or 35 feet, 15% or 20%, and a four-, six-, or eight-foot porch?
The Actual Question Submitted to the City
Resolve height, window ratio, porch depth, fence height/materials, balconies/galleries, and publish measurement formulas and diagrams.
Why It Matters
Conflicting numbers invite case-by-case concessions, inconsistent enforcement, higher design costs, and disputes after owners have already spent money.
Source
Official Record Q12 • April 2026 Draft of Como Conservation District Design Guidelines, pp. 7, 18, 20, 38, 45, 51, 56–57
Take Action
📩 Add one or two sentences explaining why this question matters to you.
SEND TO: designreview@fortworthtexas.govCC: CD@KeepLakeComoBeautiful.orgSAVE: Your sent email and the City’s written response.
Watch the Lunch Live
[EMBED QUESTION 12 VIDEO HERE]
City Response
As of August 7, 2026: KLCB has not received a substantive written response to this question.
QUESTION 13 OF 16: WHAT ARE THE TREE AND FEE RULES?
STATUS: 🟡 AWAITING WRITTEN RESPONSE
In Plain Language
Is tree canopy 30% or 40%, who pays, and who maintains parkway trees?
The Actual Question Submitted to the City
State the canopy standard, project trigger, calculation, verification, fee amount/authority/use/waiver/appeal, and responsibility for City-owned parkway trees.
Why It Matters
Tree rules can add major cost and maintenance obligations, especially on small lots, under utility lines, during drought, or where accessibility and business visibility matter.
Source
Official Record Q13 • April 2026 Draft of Como Conservation District Design Guidelines, pp. 7, 18, 38, 46–47
Take Action
📩 Add one or two sentences explaining why this question matters to you.
SEND TO: designreview@fortworthtexas.govCC: CD@KeepLakeComoBeautiful.orgSAVE: Your sent email and the City’s written response.
Watch the Lunch Live
[EMBED QUESTION 13 VIDEO HERE]
City Response
As of August 7, 2026: KLCB has not received a substantive written response to this question.
QUESTION 14 OF 16: WHICH MATERIALS AND NEZ RULES ARE REAL?
STATUS: 🟡 AWAITING WRITTEN RESPONSE
In Plain Language
Are materials prohibited, discouraged, optional, or only tied to incentives—and is the NEZ process accurately described?
The Actual Question Submitted to the City
Classify every material; explain repair/replacement of existing nonconforming materials; obtain NEZ departmental verification; separate incentive rules from overlay rules; publish cost/durability evidence.
Why It Matters
Material requirements affect insurance, repair cost, contractor availability, durability, and whether owners can use common modern products.
Source
Official Record Q14 • April 2026 Draft of Como Conservation District Design Guidelines, pp. 6, 8, 38, 42–43
Take Action
📩 Add one or two sentences explaining why this question matters to you.
SEND TO: designreview@fortworthtexas.govCC: CD@KeepLakeComoBeautiful.orgSAVE: Your sent email and the City’s written response.
Watch the Lunch Live
[EMBED QUESTION 14 VIDEO HERE]
City Response
As of August 7, 2026: KLCB has not received a substantive written response to this question.
QUESTION 15 OF 16: WHO DECIDES—AND HOW DO OWNERS APPEAL?
STATUS: 🟡 AWAITING WRITTEN RESPONSE
In Plain Language
What written decision is issued, when does the clock start, who is notified, and who can appeal?
The Actual Question Submitted to the City
Clarify COA/denial documents, decision/posting timelines, findings, every adjustable standard and percentage, notice, standing, appeal rights, neighbor participation, penalties, cure process, and open decision notifications.
Why It Matters
A vague process can leave applicants and neighbors without enough time or information to protect their interests.
Source
Official Record Q15 • April 2026 Draft of Como Conservation District Design Guidelines, pp. 8–12
Take Action
📩 Add one or two sentences explaining why this question matters to you.
SEND TO: designreview@fortworthtexas.govCC: CD@KeepLakeComoBeautiful.orgSAVE: Your sent email and the City’s written response.
Watch the Lunch Live
[EMBED QUESTION 15 VIDEO HERE]
City Response
As of August 7, 2026: KLCB has not received a substantive written response to this question.
QUESTION 16 OF 16: WHAT PROTECTS RESIDENTS—AND WILL THE PILOT BE MEASURED?
STATUS: 🟡 AWAITING WRITTEN RESPONSE
In Plain Language
What protects affordability, investment, existing owners, and businesses if Lake Como becomes Fort Worth’s first Conservation District?
The Actual Question Submitted to the City
Identify overlay-specific protections and assistance; publish cost, delay, rehabilitation, infill, affordability, displacement, tax-pressure, and property-value analyses; state the legislative path and commit to one- and two-year public evaluations.
Why It Matters
Lake Como should not become the first test case for additional regulation without measuring whether it supports—or suppresses—repair, housing, investment, business continuity, and resident stability.
Source
Official Record Q16 • April 2026 Draft of Como Conservation District Design Guidelines, p. 16 and regulatory sections • Comment matrix • July correspondence
Take Action
📩 Add one or two sentences explaining why this question matters to you.
SEND TO: designreview@fortworthtexas.govCC: CD@KeepLakeComoBeautiful.orgSAVE: Your sent email and the City’s written response.
Watch the Lunch Live
[EMBED QUESTION 16 VIDEO HERE]
City Response
As of August 7, 2026: KLCB has not received a substantive written response to this question.
HOW THIS RECORD WILL BE UPDATED
This is a living public record.
As written City responses are received, KLCB will preserve the response, update the date, and classify the result as:
ANSWERED • REJECTED • DEFERRED • CONTRADICTED • UNANSWERED
An acknowledgment that a submission was received is not the same as a substantive answer to the question.
The purpose of this record is simple: residents should be able to see what was asked, what source raised the concern, what the City answered, and what remains unresolved—without reconstructing the story from meetings, Facebook posts, or private email chains.
A meeting was scheduled.
The meeting was canceled.
The questions were not.
16 Questions. Written Answers. Before the Rules Change.
Comments